Test na charakter z Magic the Gathering i Dungeons & Dragons

Gry, quizy, humor i co tylko chcecie. Enjoy.
Awatar użytkownika
Agon
IntroManiak
Posty: 666
Rejestracja: 13 kwie 2012, 15:20
Płeć: mężczyzna

Re: Test na charakter z Magic the Gathering i Dungeons & Dra

Post autor: Agon » 15 sie 2014, 19:31

Znalazłem jakiś inny test na charakter.

Awatar użytkownika
highwind
Legenda Intro
Posty: 1727
Rejestracja: 15 paź 2011, 10:27
Płeć: mężczyzna
Enneagram: 1w9
MBTI: istj
Lokalizacja: wro

Re: Test na charakter z Magic the Gathering i Dungeons & Dra

Post autor: highwind » 15 sie 2014, 21:29

Wkurzający test. Myślisz, że kończysz, a tu następna strona pytań. Ale przebrnąłem. Wynik:
You are 36.1% Good.
You are 15.4% Lawful.
Alignment: Neutral Good

Awatar użytkownika
Εμπαθεων
Introrodek
Posty: 22
Rejestracja: 18 lip 2014, 23:08
Płeć: mężczyzna
Enneagram: 4w5
MBTI: INFJ

Re: Test na charakter z Magic the Gathering i Dungeons & Dra

Post autor: Εμπαθεων » 18 sie 2014, 17:42

Z tego: http://helloquizzy.okcupid.com/tests/th ... calculator wyszło mi tak:
  • -3 chaos, -16 evil and 11 balance!

    With regards to Law and Chaos, you are Neutral
    With regards to Good and Evil, you are Good

    ...

    Neutral Good people are practical romantics. Which might sound like a contradiction in terms, and maybe it is. They don't care though. They know the world doesn't always make sense, and that you can't put all your faith in cut-&-dried definitions. A Neutral Good person generally takes the moderate position. Both security (order) and liberty (chaos) can be good things, but one isn't necessarily better than another. In some situations the law brings the most benefit, in other cases personal freedom is more desirable. It's all relative. Order and chaos are just theoretical constructs. They are means to an end, not ends in themselves. The greater good is just that : whatever brings the greatest amount of actual good to the world. People get too hung up on definitions. Many people believe "good" has a single concrete meaning, and anyone that disagrees with their interpretation is the bad guy. Good people fight each other over different shades of meaning, never understanding that the other guy is not all that different from them. Neutral Good seeks to avoid this, knowing that a real understanding of the world is only achieved by respecting human life, keeping an open mind, and seeking Truth in all things. In the words of Socrates, "There is only one good -- knowledge. And one evil -- ignorance."

    ...

    Neutral Good is "absolute goodness." It is the purest of the good alignments, the one most concerned with bringing peace, prosperity, and happiness to the world. Being pure good, it understands pure evil better than anyone. Mankind has an almost limitless capacity for self-deception -- in the right circumstances, people will believe anything. Evil individuals or groups will try to cloud your understanding of truth and replace it with their own agenda, until eventually you believe that war is peace or two plus two equals five. Once you can no longer think objectively, they've got you where they want you. Evil's best chance of defeating good is by making people forget that good even exists ... by making them forget they have a choice. The struggle of humanity against oppression and domination can only be won by remembering what humanity actually is. To this end, Neutral Good opposes the manipulation and control of innocent people in any way, striving for an egalitarian Utopia where nobody can take advantage of anyone else. A nice idea in theory, although it'll probably never happen. Just further proof of the unrealistic incompetence that defines the good alignments in general. Unfortunately, the people who would do the most good in positions of power are often the people least capable of achieving power in the first place. And vice-versa.
W sumie pasi.

Awatar użytkownika
Agon
IntroManiak
Posty: 666
Rejestracja: 13 kwie 2012, 15:20
Płeć: mężczyzna

Re: Test na charakter z Magic the Gathering i Dungeons & Dra

Post autor: Agon » 15 lut 2015, 21:49


ODPOWIEDZ